>HOME >DATABASE

Wogaman, Philip, 1968, Guaranteed Annual Income: The Moral Issues, Nashville: Abingdon Press.


Wogaman, Philip, 196801, Guaranteed Annual Income: The Moral Issues, Nashville: Abingdon Press. 158p ISBN: 0687159784 [amazon]



■Contents

Introduction

1 A Radical New Possibility

 Background of the New Proposals
 Robert Theobald’s “Basic Economic Security”
 The Negative Income Tax
 The Social Dividend
 Family Allowances
 Guaranteed Income Without Money
 Guaranteed Opportunity to Earn an Income
 Two Other Proposals
 The Question of Practical Difficulties

2 Moral Objections to Income Without Work
 Economic Individualism
 The “Protestant Ethic”
 The Moral Case Against Guaranteed Income

3 A Christian Response to The “Protestant Ethic”

 A Christian Understanding of Economic Good
 Work and Leisure
 Which People Are “Deserving”?
 The Question of Incentives
 The Expectation of Gratitude
 Some Conclusions

4 Christian Support for Guaranteed Income

 Robert Theobald’s “Basic Economic Security”
 Milton Friedman’s Negative Income Tax Proposal
 The Social Dividend
 Family Allowances
 Guaranteed Income “in Kind”
 Guaranteed Opportunity to Earn an Income
 Categorical Assistance
 Ethical Guidelines

5 Does Guaranteed Income Mean Equality and “Collectivism”?

 The Moral Presumption of Equality
 Practical and Necessary Exceptions
 A Note on the Moral Birthright of the Young
 Private Income vs. Public Income
 What Is the Right Balance Between Private and Public?

6 Some Questions for Further Reflection

 Guaranteed Income and Present Welfare Programs
 The Effect of Guaranteed Income on Creativity and Work Opportunity
 What Effect of Guaranteed Income Have upon Population Growth and Mobility?
 Would Guaranteed Income Corrupt Responsible Government?
 Guaranteed Income in the World Perspective
 How Large Should Guaranteed Income Be?

7 Prospects and Possibilities

 Is It a Political Possibility?
 A Unique Opportunity for Christian Action




■メモ

・裏表紙:
「経済学者はそれ[保証年間所得]が可能であることに賛同する。保守とリベラルの両方の政治思想家がそれを支持する。しかし、まだ解決されなければならない点が残っている。すなわち、保証年間所得は倫理的なのか?
 ある者が稼働所得がないとき受け取るべきなのか?他方で、どのようにしてアメリカは不可避的な貧困に捕えられた3000万人の市民を最もよく解放できるのか?
 意見と議論の連発のなかで、著者が浮き彫りにするこの中心的な問題点を浮き彫りにするとともに、保証年間所得に賛成あるいは反対する倫理的な議論や、それが採用された場合の推定される影響を、検討する。
 ・・・。
 『眼前にある問題とは現在極めてシンプルな問題である。われわれは人間の生活の基本的な物質的条件を、あらゆる人間の社会的権利として保証すべきかどうか、なのだ。』」

・2 Moral Objections to Income Without Work
 The Moral Case Against Guaranteed Income
1. The injustice of income without work
2. The erosion of human creativity
3. The undermining of social fulfillment
4. The incompetence and immorality of the poor
5. The need to overcome selfish interia



製作:小林勇人(立命館大学大学院先端総合学術研究科)
UP:20060815 REV:0918 http://www.ritsumei.ac.jp/acd/gr/gsce/db1960/6801wp.htm
初期ワークフェア構想の文献表  ◇ワークフェア関連文献表

TOP  HOME(http://www.ritsumei.ac.jp/acd/gr/gsce/)