教員コラムBlog

  1. home
  2. 教員コラム / Blog
  3. 詳細 / Detail

The Takase “River” in Kyoto City

2022.09.12
  • Robert Perkins ** Photo courtesy of SatoshiHirayama @pexels.com **
  • Culture
  • Intermediate
  • 2022

In a previous post, I wrote about the shopping street “Ponto-cho” in Kyoto City and the perplexing nature of its name. However, Ponto-cho is just one of many intriguing names in Japan. This time, I’d like to consider another: The Takase River. 


The Takase River or “Takasegawa” (高瀬川) as it is called in Japanese, is in central Kyoto City beginning just south of the grounds of the Imperial Palace of Gosho and terminating kilometers later into the Kamo River. For most of its length, Takasegawa is only a few meters wide, and so shallow that it is easy to walk across. It is a calm and unassuming stream. Given this image, when examining the kanji in its name, you are in for a shock!


Separating the river’s name into its components gives you “tall” (高, taka), “rapids” (瀬, se) and “river” (川, kawa), or what would now be called “whitewater rapids” — the kind usually navigated by helmeted daredevils in rubber rafts. How was it that such a placid stream wound up with such a thrilling name?


After doing some research, I learned that from the time it was dug in the early 1600s until the 1930s, the area where Takasegawa is located often had severe seasonal flooding, so it is easy to imagine that the water could get choppy at times.


I also learned that Takasegawa was once an essential part of Kyoto City’s infrastructure, transporting people and goods to nearby Fushimi on flat bottomed boats called “Takasebune”. For over 300 years, these boats brought products like silk and spices into Kyoto while taking lumber and sake out.


Strictly speaking, calling Takasegawa “a river” is incorrect. Rivers occur naturally whereas river-like waterways created by people are referred to as canals. As Takasegawa was dug by people, it is clearly a canal. However, I do not object to this misnaming because the Japanese word for canal, “unga” (運河), does not have a pleasant sound. Surely, Takasegawa is more harmonic than Takaseunga! Wouldn’t you agree?


Q1. Why does the author find the name of Takasegawa confusing?

Q2. How did the Takase river contribute to the development of Kyoto?

Q3. Why isn't Takasegawa really a river?


Scroll down for the answers to the quiz.













A1. Because the kanji in the name indicates a raging river but the actual river is shallow and calm.

A2. By providing a route for trade and people.

A3. Because it was created artificially. 

戻る / go back

Related posts